Haptics and embodiment

Project: Inria Challenge Avatar
In this project we study the role of haptic feedback on virtual embodiment in a context of active and fine manipulation. In particular, we explore which haptic cue, with varying ecological validity, has more influence on virtual embodiment. In the experiment, force-feedback was more ecological as it matched reality more closely, while vibrotactile feedback was more symbolic. Taken together, our results show significant superiority of force-feedback over no haptic feedback regarding embodiment, and significant superiority of force-feedback over the other two conditions regarding subjective performance. Those results suggest that a more ecological feedback is better suited to elicit embodiment during fine manipulation tasks.
Within or Between? Comparing Experimental Designs for Virtual Embodiment Studies
VR 2022, IEEE, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2022
AR 20%
CORE A*
Qualis A2
@inproceedings{richard22, author = {Richard, Grégoire and Pietrzak, Thomas and Argelaguet, Fernando and Lécuyer, Anatole and Casiez, Géry}, title = {Within or Between? Comparing Experimental Designs for Virtual Embodiment Studies}, booktitle = {VR 2022}, year = {2022}, address = {Christchurch, New Zealand}, doi = {10.1109/VR51125.2022.00037}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/VR51125.2022.00037} }
Studying the Role of Haptic Feedback on Virtual Embodiment in a Drawing Task
Frontiers in VR, Frontiers, 1(28), p. 1-18, 2021
IF 3.2
Scimago Q2
@article{richard21, author = {Richard, Grégoire and Pietrzak, Thomas and Argelaguet, Fernando and Lécuyer, Anatole and Casiez, Géry}, title = {Studying the Role of Haptic Feedback on Virtual Embodiment in a Drawing Task}, journal = {Frontiers in VR}, year = {2021}, publisher = {Frontiers}, volume = {1}, number = {28}, pages = {1--18}, doi = {10.3389/frvir.2020.573167}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.573167} }